Questions on how to navigate a successful market penetration are not limited to small businesses and start-ups. For this case study, we explore how a large corporation, with multiple subsidiaries, sought out the information to introduce private sector offerings to the public sector. With a number of their subsidiaries already active in the Federal market, they understood that finding the right fit and customers was critical to developing their penetration strategy.
A leading provider of staffing and technology services to the Federal government.
How to bring a new offering to market with limited past performance.
How to bring a new offering to the market that significantly diverged from the company’s public-sector past performance. And mitigate the lack of situational awareness that left the company ill-prepared to make an informed decision on the viability of the asset and the proper approach for penetrating the Federal market.
In developing a research approach to this problem, we determined that the contractor needed to define four variables to make an informed decision.
Critical to our customer’s information needs was the ability to isolate their targeted market and analyze only relevant spending. With Federal Compass Market Explorer, the customer was able to set the criteria for their market and conduct a comprehensive market sizing exercise using a single tool. With obligations increasing by more than $300M between FY15 and FY18, there was sufficient evidence that a thriving market existed.
With more than 600 unique customers active in their market, creating a strategy for prioritizing these customers was essential to conduct a thorough penetration analysis. The capability to display each department based on spending and the number of customers streamlined the research process by creating three distinct segments of customers. Health and Human Services, DoD, and other civilian departments.
Though the two largest segments demonstrated year-over-year growth, there were immediate red flags as to the viability of these markets. Three competitors, present in both markets, had captured more than half of all spending. And over eighty-percent of the addressable market was represented by only one of the seven lines of business that their subsidiary offered. While the third market displayed greater diversification in both competitors and demand signal for their total offerings.
After determining that the third market offered the greatest potential for successfully entering the market, the next step was knowing how to gain access. Market Explorer allowed our customer to identify the primary procurement strategies for each customer in the third segment. They found an immediate pathway through one of their GSA schedules, which accounted for over half of the addressable market. And they identified recompetes of indefinite-delivery contracts that would act as their initial pipeline.
Our customer had several options to choose from to obtain the information they needed to support their decision. They found that when compared to our competitors, Federal Compass offered the ease of single tool and greater personalization. When comparing Federal Compass to a consulting engagement, they determined that they could obtain highly customized and actionable-intelligence immediately, and at a fraction of the cost of an engagement. With Federal Compass, they effectively addressed their requirements to identify market potential, target customers, and determine pathways for customer access.
Learn why everyone is talking about BIC MAC. It's more than just an OASIS 2 recomplete, it's a one-stop shop for solution-centric professional services. BIC MAC is positioned to significantly disrupt the market. We've seen from OASIS trends that contractors can expect widespread adoption across federal agencies. During this webinar we'll explore the broad range of services that can be expected on BIC MAC and the large number of contractors that are sure to participate. We'll also investigate why certain contractors have more post-award success that others, and some of the techniques to finding the right teaming partners.
written by Jim Sherwood, published 06/28/2021
With other big-ticket vehicles already competed, Polaris offers another onramp for contractors to get in on the action. We'll explore historic Alliant spending and discuss strategies for Polaris.
written by Jim Sherwood, published 05/18/2021
Is your company prepared for the shifting landscape within Federal IT procurement? For nearly twenty years, GSA Schedules and agency-IDIQs paved the way for the evolution of second-tier competitions. In 2019, GWACs outpaced IDIQs, for the first time, to become the Government's preferred pathway. Every Federal customer interacts with GWACs, and these vehicles continue to lure in new adopters. From the broad range of services to the number of contractors vying for work, the loyalty to IDIQs is waning as customers begin their march towards GWACs. For many, this statement makes sense; however, getting on a GWAC, let alone finding success, creates a challenge unique to these types of vehicles. It isn't enough to know POLARIS, CIO-SP4, and 8(a) STARS III; a clear vision and strategy are critical to determining the right team, surviving the scorecard, and moving into post-award with a proactive plan to capture business, rather than hopelessly reacting.
written by Jim Sherwood, published 03/09/2021
Revenue growth is the primary focus of every small business, but in a market as complex and fluid as the federal contracting market, growth can often stall due to the lack of the right resources. And when effectively managing expenditures puts the right resources out of reach, small businesses often get caught in a growth Catch-22.
written by Jim Sherwood, published 01/25/2021